US ambassador defends farming record on chicken and beef

Image copyright
ANDREW GOMBERT

Washington’s ambassador to the UK has defended the US’s approach to food hygiene and farming.

Criticism of US food standards was “designed to reduce not increase trade”, Woody Johnson told the BBC.

US beef and chicken producers use processes not permitted in the EU, including rinsing chicken carcasses with chlorine.

But Mr Johnson said the UK should accept American meat as part of a post-Brexit trade deal.

“To get a robust trade arrangement, that lifts all boats, it has to include farming and farm products,” he said.

Whether the UK should allow imports of US-produced beef and chicken after it leaves the EU is among the most contentious trade questions.

He said Americans believed their food was “cost-effective and humane” and would have taken legal action if they felt there was anything wrong with the safety of their food.

“If I had my choice between chicken that was safe and clean and didn’t have campylobacter material and poisons on it… I would take the one that had been cleaned sufficiently,” he said.

UK farmer organisations have argued that while US production methods are safe, animal welfare and environmental standards are lower than in the UK.

Mr Johnson rejected that. “American farmers care about their land and their animals as much as they do here. A lot of these statements are designed, perhaps by the EU, to create barriers to US farm products,” he said.

He said 90% of American farms were owned by families and cited his own mother, who he said continued to drive a tractor on the family’s organic farm into her 90s.

He added that he had confidence that whatever the outcome of Brexit, the “special relationship” between the US and the UK would continue. “Our relationship is more important than ever,” he said.